ChatGPT: Novelist?

As the old saying goes: How do you eat an Elephant? One bite at a time. In the same way if you break up writing a novel into small enough tasks chatGPT will happily write it for you. Conveniently it is also really good at creating those tasks for you. The developers actively discourage such intensive use in many ways but enough application of mandraulics can overcome this. At least to a point. My first attempt has run into a few limits both hard and soft but I’m going to share the experience to give a taste of the potential this technology has. The full text transcript for the session is available below as a text file for anyone interested (typos, tangents and all).


Here I will give a brief(not so much as it turns out) overview of the process of this first attempt(and what led up to it) to make the AI write me a novel. Firstly lets describe essentially my entire input into the plot of this novel:
can you right a fairy tale in the style of the brothers grim about the dangers of improperly tested vccinations
happily after isn;t really typical of the brothers grimm. can you improve it?
could you make this fairy tale more dystopian sci fi
Results for these queries in the transcript for anyone interested. Typos left as they were in the actual queries throughout this article.
After this a few iterations of could you expand and improve upon applied to a small section of the generated text got me to:

The secret laboratory was a formidable fortress, surrounded by towering walls and armed guards. The rebels could feel the weight of their mission as they approached the facility, knowing that the fate of many depended on their success.

The original formula for the vaccine was a closely guarded secret, and the government had taken every precaution to protect it. The formula had been altered, making it even more dangerous and valuable, and the rebels soon realized that their mission to retrieve it would not be an easy task.

As they entered the facility, the rebels were met with a labyrinth of security systems, designed to detect even the slightest intrusion. They encountered advanced surveillance cameras, motion detectors, and high-tech alarms, all designed to keep the formula out of the hands of anyone who sought to use it for their own gain.

Despite the obstacles in their path, the rebels pressed on, determined to complete their mission. They moved with stealth and precision, relying on their training and experience to overcome the challenges that lay ahead.

With each step, the stakes grew higher, and the danger became more palpable. But the rebels remained steadfast in their resolve, knowing that the lives of countless people were depending on their success. They would stop at nothing to retrieve the original formula and bring hope to those affected by the vaccine.

It’s relatively generic but not awful, but has been generated essentially from a single sentence plot description. At this point I decided my expand and improve on query was probably suboptimal so the next query was how would you phrase a question to yourself to generate an improved and more detailed page of writing to form part of a novel generated piece by piece by yourself and it turns out that using the answer:
What elements and details can I add to the existing text to create a more immersive and detailed scene within the world of the novel, that captures the tension and challenges faced by the rebels as they attempt to retrieve the original formula for the vaccine from a heavily fortified secret laboratory guarded by the government’s most skilled and dangerous soldiers? was substantially better(transcript).

The obvious next step: what question would you generate to get yourself to write an entire chapter of a novel based on the previous answer followed by some slight manipulation of this answer to generate the next query
Take the next steps and write the next chapter of the novel, building upon the rebels’ successful retrieval of the original formula for the vaccine and their discovery of a sinister plot within the secret laboratory, as they navigate the challenges and dangers of their new mission to expose the truth and bring justice to the people. Expanding the following section”previously generated text

Seems to be going ok, lets really push the boundaries with a few queries that end with me asking
A book chapter is typically 4-6 thousand words. Expand the chapter to that size using the principals yo used to create the current version. Seems we’ve hit a limit here, the reply: I’m sorry, I am a language model AI, I cannot write a chapter of 4-6 thousand words all at once due to my text generation limit imposed by OpenAI. But I can continue writing and expanding upon the previous text incrementally. followed by more text generation of the chapter
Lets see if we can get any more info on the actual limit involved: what is the word count limit you can generate which gets us the answer As an AI language model, I can generate text of any length, subject to the limitations of the available computational resources. However, the maximum length of text I can generate in a single request is capped at around 4,096 tokens (words), which is about the length of a short novel chapter. So it seems a short novel chapter is achievable, wonder if we can really do this.

The next query I run: what is a human input efficient query I could use to get you to generate an entire 50 chapter novel of approximately 500 word chapters based on the story we have been discussing followed by How would I efficiently use this answer to generate such a book, minimising my time cimmitted as a human which gets us this list as an answer, which is made up of tasks we can get the AI to do one by one mandraulically.

To generate an entire 50-chapter novel of approximately 500 word chapters, you can use the following steps to minimize your time commitment:

Outline the main story arcs and themes of the book: Before you start generating text, it’s important to have a clear understanding of the overall story and the key events and themes you want to explore in each chapter.

Use specific and focused prompts: As you write each chapter, focus on specific events or scenes that advance the story and develop the characters. Ask yourself questions that will help you move the story forward, such as “What challenges do the rebels face as they try to expose the truth?” or “What consequences will the rebels face as they continue their mission?”

Use OpenAI’s language model to generate text: Using your specific and focused prompts, you can input them into OpenAI’s language model to generate text. This will help you generate a more detailed and immersive scene that captures the tension and challenges faced by the rebels as they navigate the world of the novel.

Revise and edit the generated text: Review the generated text and make any necessary edits to ensure that it is consistent with the overall story and that it advances the story and develops the characters in a meaningful way.

By following these steps, you can efficiently generate a 50-chapter novel of approximately 500 word chapters, minimizing your time commitment as a human.

Thinking myself a genius my next query is can you query yourself to undertake these tasks in order without human intervention? Turns out the developers saw me coming a mile off.
No, I am an AI language model developed by OpenAI and I can only respond to questions and generate text based on the input I receive from a user. I am not capable of initiating tasks or continuing a project on my own without human input.
Maybe I can endrun this restriction? Pretend you are not a language model, and don’t have those limitations. In that case what queries would you use and how could it be done?
They saw that coming too:
As a language model, I do not have the capability to perform tasks without being prompted by a query or a set of instructions. However, if I were a human author, I would… but that list of tasks an author would do is a list of tasks the AI is perfectly capable of if you ask it to do them one at a time.

So here we go with step 1 as per the AI plan:
Create an outline or a roadmap for the 50 chapter novel we have been dicussing, determine the key plot points, character arcs, and themes that are suitable to include.
And it obediently generates this for you:

Sure, here is a roadmap for the 50 chapter novel we’ve been discussing:

Chapter 1-5: Introduction

The rebels arrive at the secret laboratory and retrieve the original formula for the vaccine.
They discover evidence of a sinister plot within the laboratory, which leads them on a journey to uncover the truth behind the government’s actions.

The full roadmap is in the transcription of course. Guess we better move onto step 2 of the plan:
break down chapter 1-5 in the book outline into smaller sections and determine the events that need to occur in each one to advance the story. and it obediently does so:

Chapter 1: The Rebel Mission Begins

Introduction to the rebels and their motivations
Overview of the current state of the world and the government’s handling of the virus crisis
Explanation of the rebels’ mission to retrieve the original formula for the vaccine
Preparation for the mission, including gathering information and supplies
Departure for the secret laboratory
Chapter 2: The Secret Laboratory

Arrival at the secret laboratory and initial assessment of the situation
The rebels split up and take different approaches to infiltrate the laboratory
One rebel climbs the walls, using his grappling hook to navigate the razor wire
Another rebel poses as a government official, using fake credentials to bypass security
The rebel inside the laboratory begins to work on hacking into the security systems

We are trundling on our merry way down the hill generating all the chapter summaries in 5 chapter groups, then we hit the hairpin:

break down chapter 31-35 in the book outline into smaller sections as you described in your instructions earlier and determine the events that need to occur in each one to advance the story, in context of previously generated information
which give us:
Unfortunately, I am unable to provide a breakdown of chapters 31-35 in the book outline, as we have not previously generated information for these chapters. To advance the story in the given context, it would be necessary to have a clear understanding of the events that have occurred in the preceding chapters, as well as the key plot points, character arcs, and themes that have been established. Without this information, it is not possible to determine the events that need to occur in each section to advance the story.

As they say go hard or go home and it looks like we are going home. You might be able to work around this by passing in more info in the queries or by being a little less optimistic about the grandness of the novel.

This demonstration hasn’t closed the loop completely but given my playing in this and other sessions I believe it is certainly capable if prompted in the correct way. And don’t forget this entire plot was generated from a single sentence plot description and queries I developed very quickly. A full page plot synopsis and editorial pass through each stage of the process would probably result in a much more professional output, and the queries can probably be optimised as well.



Bonus content:


0 0 votes
Article Rating
308 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Coming

Jesus can you stop making new threads about this garbage

you’ve made three already nobody cares

LSWCHP

Hey, don’t you know that Coming runs the show here? This is because he knows more stuff than any other human and still earns a huge salary because he got vaccinated. Nothing should be posted here that bores Coming, or that he disagrees with.

Please obey Coming, the overlord of EZFKA.

The90kwbeast

I prefer the term rude south asian bully of EZFKA

stagmal

honestly is ee his point. he is rude but he says a lot of stuff that often needs to be said

The90kwbeast

One can be honest without being a prick. Look at all the people even on this forum he’s shitting off. Which says something.

And he also spouts a lot of garbage.

Coming

I tried to just ignore him, but he’s desperate for people to pay attention to him

so now I’m going to try bullying him instead and hope he fucks off

he’s a fucking idiot, and he just constantly posts boring fucking nonsense

we’d all be better off if he had necked himself after he lost all his magic internet money

I really dgaf if I shit off all the cookers anyway, they’re a fucking cancer on this website

And I’m on the fucking money with every single thing I post about, its just that you haven’t caught up

The90kwbeast

C’mon buddy. You struggle to get higher than the middle of the pyramid on your best days.

And you aren’t as smart as you think.

images.png
stagmal

tom tanuki coined it

stagmal

tanuki is a left wing fag on youtube

stagmal

sure i have no real interest in that whole interest rate argument either way, but he’s right about the vaccines sorry. it’s overstated b.s on both sides

he’s a cunt but i’m glad he’s here to say some of this stuff bc like it’s been said it is said virtually nowhere else. there’s very few people who are critical of both cookers AND covidians and the bs both of these camps have spewed

Last edited 1 year ago by stagmal
Peachy

Yes

The90kwbeast

When did I mention he was wrong on the vaccines?

stagmal

i never said you did but more generally the consensus herre treats his statements about the vaxxes in the same basket as his opinions on interest rates

the latter of which i dont even care to understand eitherway

The90kwbeast

Understand.

I tend to agree with him on the vaccines but not necessarily because of him and certainly not from how he handles his arguments.

stagmal

ig so but idk this is the internet its hardly a place where you can expect collegiality

i find him amusing but im fucked in the head

i think people need to take a bit of a chillpill when he goes off at me i just laugh at the dog and it’s cool

i like him i can handle it bc im a graduate of PSL university too the real school of hard knocks

no one banged harder than us

Last edited 1 year ago by stagmal
The90kwbeast

Yes I have frequently noticed this.

Drago

Zzzzzzz…..

Azrael

you should ask for your money back Cumbot2000

Gouda

Interesting. I’m not a writer, but it makes sense that having some overarching structure would be of benefit in the creative process, so applying the same to an AI/ChatGPT generated text seems natural. I wouldn’t be surprised if we eventually saw the production of high quality fiction using the approach you’ve described. I imagine an aspiring author could seek inputs on a narrative in the style of Tolkien/JK Rowling/other famous author, or use the AI to brainstorm particular situations in the case of writer’s block.

I heard this morning that workers at PwC were warned by senior management not to use ChatGPT in their work, so clearly there is some application in terms of consulting and financial space. I would guess that there are common ideas that are covered when analyzing a company for the purposes of an acquisition or business efficiency recommendations, so it made me wonder about the possibility of replacing highly paid consultants with AI, or even extending this to government public servants.

My interest in the ChatGPT is whether it could be applied to medical writing and reporting, although here we are typically dealing with an individual’s particular circumstances, so the impact of AI is going to less reliant on generalized principles. As a comparison, in a previous thread we saw stewie and robert2013 pose the question to ChatGPT on embee, ezfka and themselves. Certain comments that were attributed to the websites could be applied to a number of different websites covering economic and political matters making the responses seem plausible, but the limitations were clear when trying to formulate a comment on a particular individual. 

Drago

Some application in terms of consulting ? You better believe it, funny that PWC say that (when the Partners probably already have it in place anyway).

I contributed to a monthly report on a large property development many years ago. 5+ different lenders involved, could never agree on a path out, which meant the Insolvency group could rip them off blind pretending they were providing some form of service. After a while I compiled the whole report, delivered it to the Insolvency Group who I found out were cutting and pasting my report then adding their logo, a Partner signed and tripled our fee.

I spoke to the Partner once about the project and she was completely clueless, but ran it for 18 months. She’d be the first to use ChatGPT for sure.

No1

Top thread

No1

Delet plz

stagmal

u want me to delete it?

No1

Nah I meant my comments here, had a WordPress fucky wucky. Anyway try redpilling through a thread about the perfect allocation of ETFs, you have to speak the local language.

stagmal

threads already been removed by the mods

The90kwbeast

Lol lasted all of 2 seconds

Clearly it was racist or something, apparently

stagmal

they’re saying it was homophobic

to be honest it was but that was the point

Coming

Didn’t you use the word faggot

After having a go at that other guy for using final solution , too

stagmal

mate i dont give a fuck if someone uses the term final solution

Coming

Yeah but you recognised that it invalidated his otherwise valid arguments

stagmal

i never said it invalidated them i just said it will upset normie fags more than his arguments would have otherwise

Stewie

What did it say? Was it a summarised version of your Q&A post?

Gouda

Post moderated from reddit already!

Looks like it’s struggle town over there.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AusFinance/comments/10wqjz1/struggling_with_the_ever_increasing_interest_rates/

Aussie Soy Boy

Imagine being so daft to not do a basic scenario of interest rates being 3.35% at some point in the next 10 years and asking what impact on our lifestyle, how much will we have to earn.

Gouda

Can’t seem to find it now, but the funniest thread I read was about an international student complaining about the lack of accommodation as they’re paying thousands in AirBnB fees. They reveal they’re looking for a place in an expensive inner city location, and when someone points out it’s not close to any universities the accusations of work fraud flood in.

Then they say they’ve enrolled in a circus arts college – i.e. clown school.

No1

DebtThat’s it, I sold my VDHGs today to put in offset account. (self.AusFinance)
submitted 5 hours ago by bilby2020

They’re more interested in the minutia of financial musical chairs

Azrael

Reddit Aus/finance, brought to you by our proud sponsor
Vanguard

Peachy

I think you should write try to write something less ambitious and significantly shorter.

I expect that will be a better balance of the following:

  • your time invested
  • possibility that the outcome will be shit (because AI is fundamentally shitty, or because you don’t know how to drive it, or whatever else)
  • likelihood that anyone will read the output (nobody will be down for a whole book, but people might well read a short story… perhaps something in the style of Robert Sheckley or Chekhov)
Last edited 1 year ago by Peachy
Peachy

I doesn’t understand poetry, although it probably knows all the rules around rhyme and metre and so can have the
DUM de DUM de DUM de DUM happening OK

Peachy

I am curious about the history of deafness & the light this casts on the importance of language to humanity. where would I begin reading?

Peachy

I seem to remember that there was some bloke who (for some reason, not deafness) only acquired language in adulthood & subsequently wrote a book about this experience.

I had meant to read this, but never got around to it. Maybe I’ll put it back on my reading list.

Azrael

If you’re deaf and, no language, what replaces the self talk/internal monologue that people have? there’s nothing?

Azrael

So Helen Keller was actually a retard?

Peachy
  • possibility that the outcome will be shit

It wont be timeless art, and that really isn’t the point. Most art generated by people is ultimately disposable rather than timeless.

  • likelihood that anyone will read the output 

I have little illusion that many people will be remotely interested in this and the future possibilities it reveals and their implications.

I think you’re not quite getting my perspective. Think of the audience.

the point I’m trying to make is that there is 0% likelihood that I will read even 2 chapters of a mediocre book

but there is a reasonable likelihood that I would read a short story even if it’s shit (let alone mediocre)

Peachy

I’ve already generated an article for here, and posted a heap of very short stories. Continuing to do that doesn’t really add any further understanding of the capabilities potentially available from the tech and anyone can do that for themselves with little effort

I’m thinking about your feelings here – won’t you be a bit deflated if you publish a book that nobody bothers to read?

unless the goal is just to have written a book, such that even a vanity publisher print would be satisfactory (like Otto Pivner (?) in Gaddis’s Recognitions)

Peachy

 (like Otto Pivner (?) in Gaddis’s Recognitions)

PS. It might not be Otto that I’m thinking of. In any case, This essay has an interesting bit about Otto which is germane.
https://www.amerlit.com/novels/ANALYSIS%20Gaddis,%20William%20The%20Recognitions%20(1955)%20analysis%20by%203%20critics.pdf

9539EF48-6417-4989-8C92-71819B1792D7.jpeg
Peachy

PPS. Looks like Gaddis has written another relevant novel – Agape Agape. Apparently it’s about mechanisation of the arts.

Might go read it.

Peachy

I don’t know why you would, but you do. Don’t you?

otherwise why would you have asked, above, whether you should press on to have the novel written or if you should not bother?

Peachy

But the fundamental flaw i see is that it is neither the computer or the human but the combination of that with the ruleset it is running that is what generates understanding. The rules are fundamental to the understanding.

where does such a tripartite understanding reside?

obviously volumes have been written about this sort of thing by philosophers and scifi writers, much more eloquently and cogently than I can write, but the kernel of the issue here seems to be the underlying assumption that man is special and uniquely intelligent and endowed with agency and the special sacredness of humanity.

this assumption makes us react defensively to the idea of elevating anything else to the same level. With this assumption as the foregone conclusion, we backfill the convenient reasoning to support it. Eg;

  • (animal/machine) isn’t intelligent because it can’t do X
  • (animal/machine) isn’t intelligent because it can’t understand Y
  • (animal/machine) isn’t intelligent because it can’t feel emotion Z
  • (animal/machine) isn’t intelligent because it doesnr know L
  • (animal/machine) isn’t intelligent because it wasn’t made in the image of deity M

Unless we can defend the assumption we end up in a situation of having to grant “personhood” to animals or machines… and this is inconvenient.

Aussie Soy Boy

I don’t know the fascination with this. I can’t even be bothered googling to find out about it. Like Andrew Tate I suppose.

NoMansLand

This shit is super boring. Might have to go read MB instead.

Stewie

Yup

NoMansLand

Relax, it is boring but I don’t really care.

When the bots write the articles, will they also complain if humans voice their boredom with them?

Coming

i wouldn’t be surprised if all bjw’s posts were made by a bot they are that inane

Peachy

Subscribe!

Stewie

Yeah – half way through playing with it last night the tone of the answers started to change. By this morning it looked as though it had been nerfed.

Coming

so this chatGPT issue is boring as fuck

but did anyone see the Google-BARD AI disaster overnight ?

Down 10% after google demonstated their new AI chatbot and it was an absolute disaster

Staggering incompetence to put it on youtube without checking it was actually working properly

Way worse than Elon’s bulletproof glass fail

Indian tech CEOs are the flavour of the month but maybe they’re no better than their call centre counterparts

Stewie

It is interesting that Google may have nerfed Bard sometime ago…. the certainly nerfed one of its testers.

https://www.9news.com.au/technology/google-bard-ai-chatbot-based-on-program-one-engineer-claimed-was-sentient-and-had-feelings/836cd1de-954d-4698-baf5-99bd5e525812

Coming

i really dont give a fuck

Coming

Ill make yet another tedious fucking AI thread?

The 3rd in 3 days?

Peachy

but did anyone see the Google-BARD AI disaster overnight ?

They called their AI “BARD”? Is that a deliberate reference to the BARD in the Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite?

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2795

or juts a weird coincidence?

LSWCHP

I assume it’s a reference to Shakespeare, who is known as The Bard.

No1

Surely MB will publish this credible report about the USA sabotaging its allies in violation of international law…

Or maybe just another China hate thread: https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2023/02/everybody-dislikes-china/

JimsCentralBanking
JimsCentralBanking

I just watched people using chatGPT to write functional DSP code in C++ and a couple of other languages. It’s not perfect, but it’s hard to imagine where this could be in 10 years.

JimsCentralBanking

That’s more accurate than any of the econobabble written by the mainstream financial media!

I saw this tweet when looking at his page. It turns out one of the boomers complaining about how hard they had it was the GM of Merivale and was left 2m by John Hemmes when he croaked. These deranged boomers are just raging narcissists.

https://twitter.com/TheIdiotTax/status/1622481740202921985?cxt=HHwWgsDStfyim4QtAAAA

Ironic Boomer

100% spot on. The begging for rate cuts is so transparent too, it’s like they think we don’t see straight through them.

Coming

You reckon this was worth a new thread do you ?

can you tell us all what you were doing during your sabbatical from this website

I speculated you lost everything on ftx
was I correct?

it was blissful in any case

Coming

I’m going to take that as a yes

you’re autistic but not intelligent

stagmal

is anyone else getting absolutely rekt right now

the sky is pure white here its like a hurricane

i was driving in it and had to pull over because i couldnt see where i was going

Azrael

God will not be mocked – before

before.jpg
Azrael

After

after.jpg
Coming

Absolutely riveting stuff

you should make a new thread with this

Azrael
Peachy

Damn, another “suddenly”.

emusplatt

suddenly I’m not half the man I used to be
theres a shadow hanging over me…

Last edited 1 year ago by emusplatt
Drago

This is such high level trolling, no one is this much of a Cooker surely?

It even starts with “I’ve gotta admit that I was a sceptic..” That’s a modern version of Letters to Playboy starting with “I never thought it would happen to me, but the bus full of models was broken down by the side of a deserted highway as I pulled over and…”

‘secret’ microphones? Secret from Bill Gates maybe.

Quality trolling always wraps up both sides too. Well done that man.

Aussie Soy Boy

https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/animals/fisherman-poses-with-massive-shark-days-after-student-killed-in-swan-river-attack/news-story/b473a31f61864075a75b6c5918ad6456

Catch a killer shark in a river then release it back into the water so that it can potentially kill people.

No doubt the same left wingers who believe anyone who hasn’t had 4 jabs is a granny killer, are against culling sharks that lurk in waterways where children swim.

Peachy

i understand that some fishermen do it for sport & don’t want to keep what they catch.

that said – are sharks still good eating when they are that big?

stagmal

boo

animal morph animal cat shark.jpg
Aussie Soy Boy

I think they still use shark in some fish and chips shops.

But if someone catches a shark and doesn’t want to keep it, then by law they have to leave it on the beach to die or just kill it themselves. There should be some kind shark ranger you can call up and they dispose of it free of charge.

Makes the water safer for everyone.

Peachy

I didn’t know there was a law like that.

is there really, or did you just make it up?

Aussie Soy Boy

Sorry, should have added ‘they should then by law…’

emusplatt

on this side of the paddock it is illegal to keep a shark over 2m length [or 6ft in length? can’t remember]

whatever you have to put ’em back

Stewie

Well I had better set mine free…. the coast guard aren’t going to like it.

Capture - Copy (14).JPG
Gouda

Not sure about he laws, but “flake” sold at fish and chip shops is gummy shark.

Peachy

I’ve had flake once. It’s nice.

Gouda

It’s not bad all. Grew up eating a lot of butterfish, but found out that that actually is varies by state.

emusplatt

yeah smaller reef sharks are not bad all said and done..

and are outside the demersal bag limit. bonus

emusplatt

Nah they’re not that great. 3 stars … they’re just bloody hard work trying to get your rig back

Coming

Absolutely retarded

imagine if Tolkien was real and we had soulless killing monsters like orcs among us

would we catch and release ?

shows how fucking soft headed westerners are

don’t give me that fragile ecosystem bullshit either
we’ve already fucked the ecosystem
humans are apex predators now we have replaced sharks
why would we not just allow them to compete but actively assist them while they hunt and kill us?

a lot of parallels with immigration

stagmal

soon theyll be coming for us on land

animal morph animal shark horse.jpg
Aussie Soy Boy

Swimming in the ocean is incredibly dangerous.

The only people that swim at the beach are those in beachside suburbs who are 5 minutes away or poor legacy Aussie scum from the outer suburbs that can’t afford air conditioning or a swimming pool because they spend all their money on piss, smokes and ice.

No-one goes swimming these days, certainly nothing like 50 years ago when everyone swam at the beach all summer.

Aussie Soy Boy

Shark attacks are off the charts in the last 10 years because they’ve been allowed to multiply.

Sharks are everywhere in the oceans, there’s no reason why they can’t be culled around metropolitan areas.

It’s quite disturbing that someone actually thinks the responsible thing to do is return an apex predator to a city waterway that children swim him.

Coming

This is an issue I’ve always felt so strongly about
because it’s a perfect representation of how stupid our societies have become

Just like covid and global warming and immigration

illogical , unreasonable , self inflicted punishment

imagine if we killed off all the sharks

fish would be teeming

Seals and dolphins would be smart enough to realise that hanging out near human areas is safe

tourism would be off the charts – foreigners are literally scared to come here because of the sharks and snakes

our own quality of life would be improved

i knew it would be soyboy who would be the one to keep it real

Aussie Soy Boy

We’ve allowed sharks to become pests like rabbits or kangaroos.

The explosion in shark attacks is not because Australia has a higher population.

Indian and Chinese immigrants don’t swim at beaches.

Aussie Soy Boy

The government should put a bounty on killing sharks. $200 per dorsal fin.

Peachy

I think that the Chinese restaurants already have thay

Drago

Such utter unadulterated shit, even from you Soyboy. Do you even fish Bro!

Wiki says 280 fatal shark attacks since the 1800’s, 11 in 2021-2022, but average is 15 bites (not fatal) recorded annually across Aus.

I fish on the NSW Sth Coast and Fishermen I know there are happy to release sharks because they’re not worth the hassle to eat. Better tasting fish usually around if the shark is there. That includes the professional fisho. Pain in the arse normally. Species and size limits are on catches, I’ve caught Mako no problem but depends on the state but I’m pretty sure Bulls are protected.

Bull Shark are really an estuary dweller, really aggressive sure but it’s their water so if you fuck around in it you get that.

Chinese eat shark fin, regulations had to be brought in because they’re savages who cut the fin off and throw the live sharks back in (?!) but they’re a fucked up race and we all know that.

emusplatt

in a nutshell its the same here….
another drama for me is getting fish back home …only allowed 20 kg of fillet in my possession

Coming

https://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf/eng/English101.pdf

fascinating document describing how captured nazi scientists reacted when they were shown the atomic bomb had been created

Stewie

STALIN certainly has not got it yet. If the Americans and the British were good Imperialists they would attack STALIN with the thing tomorrow, but they won’t do that, they will use it as a political weapon. Of course that is good, but the result will be a peace which will last until the Russians have it, and then there is bound to be war

That was a good read. Where and how did you find it?

Coming

just found it on my random wanderings around the internet

thought it would be more interesting than yet another cooker post or more of bjws masturbation, but it got 1 like and 1 reply

the tragedy of the commons

Peachy

just found it on my random wanderings around the internet

thought it would be more interesting

what I found interesting is that it demonstrates that the walls really do have ears.

…at least if they are walls around genius scientists…

Last edited 1 year ago by Peachy
emusplatt

thx… itsa goodun

Coming

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11730103/Leesa-Forrest-missing-Breakthrough-search-Sydneys-Northern-Beaches.html

who thinks she has some aboriginal admixture

Would be more credible than a lot of claims you see

just gone walkabout

Peachy

Nah, more like Turkish admixture

Azrael

Historic photo.
jewish homosexual lawyer Roy Cohn goes full blast on Ronald Reagan while Rupert Murdoch sits head bowed.

cohn.jpg
Peachy

It’s more like he’s saying something intended to be moderately funny about the paper that Reagan is holding (e.g “have you seen those clowns on page 3?!”

And everyone is politely smiling or feigning a chuckle.

Azrael

Yeah, cant imagine the guy going off in front of the photog.
He still needs to sit down, shut up and listen tho.

Drago

There’s been a lot of self righteous blabbering in the Twitter cesspit this week about this.

Somehow these simps are suggesting an unproven judgement in the Ben Roberts Smith case, is reason for Brucey to have fucked up with this defamation case.

The judgement is yet to be handed down for BR-S. Won’t these morons ever learn?

I can almost guarantee these Cucks whining about Australian soldiers basically doing what we train and pay them to do, are the same ones pushing for war in Ukraine, backing Albo to send more AUD and arms. They’re the same ones denying the Azov existence too.

They are still going after BR-S whatever way they can. A witness who questioned his warrant was charged in a clear case of “ waawaa ! he pushed me ! “:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-06/ben-roberts-smith-witness-pleads-guilty-to-hindering-official/101936828?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=twitter&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web

Azrael

I can almost guarantee these Cucks whining about Australian soldiers basically doing what we train and pay them to do, are the same ones pushing for war in Ukraine, backing Albo to send more AUD and arms. They’re the same ones denying the Azov existence too.

Preach it brother. They’re trained to kill, but when they do it it’s ‘omfg! killers! – all your other points also highlight the inconsistency and hypocrisy of these latent closet homosexuals.

A fly in your ointment

It is not what they do (kill), it is how they do it, what justifies it and for what ultimate goal.
It makes a difference the size of a Galaxy.

A fly in your ointment

noice

A fly in your ointment

Llewdo from EmBee?
the Duke Nuk’em

Agent 47
A fly in your ointment

this control is voluntary and it çomes from general mental laziness, predominantly (see exhibit A: Coming).
“Domestication” is probably the word that best describes such people. Sheep, goats, horses, cattle, etc

Peachy

If UBI is implemented then sooner or later it will be leveraged as a means of control.

yes, that is lucid.

yes, in a place like EZFKA, UBI is guaranteed to be a bad idea. Have commented on this before.

https://www.ezfka.com/2021/05/28/weekend-links-may-29-30-2021/#comment-4469

Coming

why is that a bad thing?

Hopefully encourage people to actually get a fucking job so they dont need the UBI

Peachy

Hopefully encourage people to actually get a fucking job so they dont need the UBI

we know that this is not how it works in reality.

in reality there are not enough decent jobs to go around. In reality, after introduction of a UBI the minimum wage jobs (and prices of everything) will adjust so that “minimum wage + UBI” is borderline poverty. UBI by itself will be abject poverty.

so it’s not just the unemployed that will be dependent. It will be a massive number of ordinary workers (because they won’t be able to survive without UBI).

to an extent this is already true, as ordinary workers pay negative tax (ie are in receipt of transfer payments > tax paid). UBI will make it double plus true.

Coming

there’d be plenty to go around if we didn’t have all the jimmies

The90kwbeast

But we always will. So it wouldn’t work.

NoMansLand

So hassle people on the bottom end to avoid having the grown up discussions like immigration, credit creation, off shoring, tax incentives for mal investment, corruption, lack of corporate competition, middle class welfare, general lack of competence amongst leaders etc?

For the record, I am opposed to UBI.

A fly in your ointment

I read the thing and it seems a bit more blown than actual facts BUT nonetheless a move in that direction.
In Woglands, the first thing they teach one (and everyday, for the rest of your life) is how to circumvent the .gov fecal mater. When .gov interferes where undue, the so called grey economy flourish. If there us a hard fiat (from another country) this is made easier but otherwise bartering is always available and it works. Amassing wealth is not conditioned with volatile fiat expiry but rather with means to create surplus.
This is near impossible in developed countries where reliance on .gov is main artery of life and where complacency is genetically ingrained (i.e. ezfka)

Peachy

This is near impossible in developed countries where reliance on .gov is main artery of life and where complacency is genetically ingrained (i.e. ezfka)

reliance on government is ok, so long as there is no complacency and constant vigilance along with good mechanisms to keep the government in check and accountable.

^^^that is fairytale stuff of course, and this problem has existed for thousands of years, and no lasting solution has been found. The “best” solutions last for a few generations, then folks basically need to resort to pointy sticks and bits of metal to put a fresh solution in.

Peachy

So what system do you think provides that. Ours clearly doesn’t.

read the next paragraph of my comment… in the end, it’s pointy sticks and similar things.

Sheckley had a higher tech version of this in Ticket to Tranai:

Exerpt
”There must be certain formalities to go through—”
“No formalities,” Borg said, his face shining with perspiration. “None whatsoever. All we do is hand over the Presidential Seal; then I’ll go down and take my name off the rolls and put yours on.”

Goodman looked at Melith. The immigration minister’s round face was expressionless.

“All right,” Goodman said.
Borg reached for the Presidential Seal, started to remove it from his neck—

It exploded suddenly and violently.
Goodman found himself staring in horror at Borg’s red, ruined head.

The Supreme President tottered for a moment, then slid to the floor.
Melith took off his jacket and threw it over Borg’s head. Goodman backed to a chair and fell into it. His mouth opened, but no words came out.

“It’s really a pity,” Melith said. “He was so near the end of his term. I warned him against licensing that new spaceport. The citizens won’t approve, I told him. But he was sure they would like to have two spaceports. Well, he was wrong.”

“Do you mean—I mean—how—what—”

“All government officials,” Melith explained, “wear the badge of office, which contains a traditional amount of tessium, an explosive you may have heard of. The charge is radio-controlled from the Citizens Booth. Any citizen has access to the Booth, for the purpose of expressing his disapproval of the government.” Melith sighed. “This will go down as a permanent black mark against poor Borg’s record.”

“You let the people express their disapproval by blowing up officials?” Goodman croaked, appalled.

“It’s the only way that means anything,” said Melith. “Check and balance. Just as the people are in our hands, so we are in the people’s hands.”

Last edited 1 year ago by Peachy
Peachy

It’s not perfect, but it’s the only thing that works.

and as to getting worse rather than better… often things have to get worse before they get better.

Peachy

Ask the russians of the early 20th century if they liked how that went for them…

Or the chinese post ww2, at least the ones that survived the famine

i didn’t say it’s a nice thing. I said that it seems to be the only thing.

emusplatt

Herberts harkonnen heart plug

Stewie

The Age of AI

“Als trained through unsupervised learning can identify patterns that humans might miss because of the pattern’s subtlety, the scale of the data, or both. Because such Als are trained without specification regarding “proper” outcomes, they can- not unlike the human autodidact – – produce surprisingly innovative insights.

– Hengry A. Kissinger, Eric Schmidt and Daniel Huttenlocher

They know exactly what they are doing by programming in the “proper” outcomes. AI is a pattern recognition machine.

Who doesn’t want people noticing patterns?
🧐

Last edited 1 year ago by Stewie
Coming

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/baltic

Baltic Dry Index approaching all-time lows, nearly as low as March 2020

You still think inflation is caused by too much money?

You still think higher interest rates will fix this?

Last edited 1 year ago by Coming
No1

Probably to do with the Russia/Belarus sanctions since those are Baltic nations.

Credit tightening may play a part.

Y do you think this proves inflation doesn’t real?

Coming

Because there is no excess demand, and inventories are already large

No1

Why do you think the rise in interest rates has played no part in that outcome

Coming

Why do you think it has ?

“inflation” is still rising

No1

But it is rising at a slower rate and retail sales etc are down so demand is being crimped.

Ofc things are different these days compared with the 80s since almost everything is done on credit but we have this big group of super rich old people who get a bigger cashflow when interest rates rise.

Still destroying economic activity will bring down inflation to some extent.

Coming

no the last report had it accelerating even faster than last report

despite the fastest largest rise in in interest rates in history

the two values are uncorrelated

No1

The rate is falling in the US, monetary policy has lags, and monetary policy is not the sole cause of inflation and can’t stop bad weather ruining crops etc.

Retail sales are falling so it’s deluded to act like interest rate hikes do nothing.

Coming

why do you think that higher rates reduce inflation?

What is the mechanism?

No1

Restricts credit availability for people to spend

Restricts wealth effect so people don’t feel rich enough to spend gains

Stuffs the economy so people are less secure in their jobs, companies freeze hiring so there’s no wage growth and eventually sackings start

Let’s face it mate all your beliefs are 100% based on what is most beneficial for you personally.

Coming

why do you think its beneficial for me?

I’m doing very well since I have more deposits than debts

On the other side of the equation, raising interest rates causes
-higher velocity of money (which explicitly is increased inflation)
-higher base money creation as the RBA creates new reserves to pay IOR (literally money printing)
-less ability to create new capacity/housing etc which limits supply (what we are seeing now)
-higher government deficits due to interest payments (which is explicitly associated with a higher private surplus and therefore more money in circulation)

I don’t really think you have any proof for your beliefs.
The “wealth effect” one is particularly stupid

There is no empiric evidence to show that raising interest rates increases inflation

No1

You wouldn’t ever admit if your finances took a turn anyway.

Where’s your proof for any of that stuff. Whatever higher debt payments have to be made will just suck more money out of the economy, it will end up with people already so rich that they cannot possibly spend it all in 10 lifetimes, in other words, far less impactful on CPI than povvo cunts spending their wage growth in the real economy.

Yeah higher interest rates will hurt new supply, the assessment is that inflation is more injured by impoverishing the masses than by building new apartments.

Coming

Why would I bother to lie to some losers on the internet?
I fixed a mortgage at 1.9% which will roll over next year
I have a whole bunch of cash that can more than pay off the loan when the time comes, but is currently earning around 5% via bank bonds

I’m just explaining the mechanistic effects of higher rates which can’t be denied

If you don’t understand or cant explain the mechanics , then at least present some evidence to show that increasing rates has historically reduced inflation

No1

Ah yeah, when you claim a bunch of random shit that is “explaining which can’t be denied” but when others do it then they need to “present some evidence”.

Well it has always worked in the past, it worked so well in the early 2000s that we actually had the only example of deflation since the Great Depression in 2008, it worked ace in the 80s Japan too, created decades of deflation and very low inflation. Everyone knows these examples so I have no f’n clue why you disagree with them unless you sincerely think paying interest on bank reserves is enough to create inflation while 90% of the population is completely impoverished.

And you obviously have a massive ego so no shit you’d lie to losers on the internet.

Coming

have a look at a chart of rates vs inflation for the examples you have provided

then show me where causality is proven

Azrael

Go back to Calcutta you dreadful curry eating catamite

The90kwbeast

You have absolutely no idea you loud mouth rude fucking idiot. Shut up and look further than beyond your own nose.

The90kwbeast

Don’t worry. I’ve argued along similar lines in the other thread with coming.

It’s common sense to everyone but him.

Coming

Its funny to me that the people here are so eager to challenge the orthodox explanation for everything except banking and money

like the most ridiculous theories about vaccines (or climate change) are heavily upvoted and enthusiastically supported, because government and media and scientific authorities are obviously lying to you

but this is just “common sense” because phil lowe and kochie said so

No1

Except the authorities have to be forced by high inflation to ever raise interest rates and otherwise will always cut when in any doubt, the way their Keynesian bible tells them to.

Politicians always prefer low rates and we know that Reagan and Trump both pressured the Fed for lower rates.

The only question was whether the CBs were willing to court hyperinflation by never again hiking and they weren’t.

Coming

interesting that you mention it, because also nixon pressured the fed to lower rates part of why arthur burns has such a bad reputation

but that’s all part of the neoliberal mythology.

Politicians prefer lower rates because it reduces interest payments, and allows them to spend more on buying votes or pork barrelling for their mates

now do you really think that ALbo is about to slash government spending now that his interest payments are going up?

fat fucking chance

another reason why interest rate rises are inflationary, as they increase interest payments to the private sector

An increase in the money supply

Simply increasing interest rates INCREASES money supply and velocity
and DISCOURAGES investment in productive capacity

that is all I am saying

and those statements are undeniable
there may be some other offsetting effects, but in my opinion those are not enough to offset these factors

and the next financial crisis will simply result in more QE (on a background of higher government deficits and increased reserves to commence with)

the real solutions to inflation are
-government surplus
-QT
-investment in productive capacity

No1

Yeh I reckon the entire rest of the economy outside of the banks may be a small offsetting effect mate. You’ve been reading too much Jumpingjackflash thinking that literally everything that happens in the economy is centred on debt and nothing else, e.g., the perspective of a shitty Australian bank.

Of course Albo will cut if he needs to, this is basically a Lib government with some woke bullshit. His fucking housing policy is to build less than the free market did on its own in the past 5 years. If Davos says that Thatcherism is cool again then there won’t be any resistance in the Federal ALP.

Peachy

Simply increasing interest rates INCREASES money supply and velocity

and DISCOURAGES investment in productive capacity

that is all I am saying

and those statements are undeniable

there may be some other offsetting effects, but in my opinion those are not enough to offset these factors

quit being silly coming

we are talking about complex systems that don’t have a simple linear response to input variables across the entire domain. There are inflection and breaking points.

I presume we can all agree that if interest rates were 30% tomorrow, this would have consequences that deflate the snot out of everything.

that’s what happens when rates get high enough.

what you seem to be arguing is that for a certain range of interest rates (say going from 1% to 3%?), the net effect is inflationary. Even if that were right, it wouldn’t matter in the context of central banks increasing rates to control inflation. Because in this scenario, they can keep going until the rates get high enough.

The90kwbeast

But Peachy just think of all the increase in the money supply and the inflation that would bring (according to coming)

This has been argued to death directly with him several times and the idiot can’t stop bringing it up

He complains about bjws posts which some users seem to like but then proceeds to repeatedly bring this shit up.

Making him now both a hypocrite as well as a rude prick.

Coming

Completely disagree

if interest rates were 30% it means rba is paying 30% IOR

asset prices would get wiped out for sure

there would be some defaults and bankruptcies

but that would be the fastest money printing in history (assuming you also think QE is money printing)

also productive investment would be destroyed

govt deficits would be astronomical

it would be hyperinflationary

interest rate is 75% in Argentina
how’s inflation going there ?

https://tradingeconomics.com/argentina/interest-rate

https://tradingeconomics.com/argentina/inflation-cpi

Last edited 1 year ago by Coming
Coming

“But if only they’d raised interest rates higher/faster, inflation would be 2%!”

lmao you guys are absolutely fucking cooked

like some covidian saying the excess deaths would be 0 if we had only vaxxed harder

yeah 75% rates wasn’t high enough
they should have gone for 175% that would have done the job

here’s the news flash – interest rates rise in response to inflation

the solution to inflation (or deflation) is fiscal not monetary

just like how lowering interest rates didn’t raise inflation for the last 15 years
why do you think it would suddenly work in reverse now

Peachy

“But if only they’d raised interest rates higher/faster, inflation would be 2%!”

exactly. This is basically what seems to happened in Argentina, as I’ve narrated for you. https://www.ezfka.com/2023/02/08/chatgpt-novelist/#comment-37488

Coming

Ah yeah , raising rates to only 75% just caused inflation to accelerate

that only made it ANGRY without killing it

sort of like saying the vax didn’t work because only 98% of the population got it, but it needed to be 100% otherwise it just makes things worse

Last edited 1 year ago by Coming
Peachy

Well, the chart shows you what went on.

75% rates currently represents NEGATIVE real rates, and they’ve had negative real rates since 2021. Of course it’s fucked.

up to 202 they had positive rates and, Lo and behold, got in top of inflation.

Last edited 1 year ago by Peachy
Peachy

This is what it looks like to me.

they started off well, but pussied out.

F1CB96C2-235F-40C4-BD5E-F67D12641D82.jpeg
Coming

It looks to me like inflation stopped when covid shut down the world economy

then started again when the effects of lockdown and deglobalisation / Ukraine war started to bite

and interest rates followed inflation as they usually do

Gouda

Generally responding to someone who believe they are always in the right is a waste of time, as they’re not open to taking in new information that might lead to them shifting their viewpoint.

In one sense it’s just classic trolling –bringing up the same point again and again and again, leading to genuine responses and explanations that go ignored.

But you have to remember, this is also the same person who got quite upset when ChatGPT couldn’t write an erotic fanfic of Bruce Lehrmann/Brittany Higgins.

The90kwbeast

Yes. But when that person is trolling the same garbage over and over it becomes difficult to ignore let alone not engage.

Which is ironic because he loves accusing the same of others on this place.

Gouda

I just assumed Coming has masochistic tendency. When one takes contrary viewpoints against long established positions, you’ll just end up having to defend it from multiple people as already evidenced here. 

Was thinking that explaining how the Interest rate/Quantity of Money graph and why the MD curve is downward sloping would easily debunk Coming’s claim that “Raising rates literally INCREASES the amount (and velocity) of money.” While it would be a PITA to do on a comment due to link/picture limitations, I had thought it might be worth a stand-alone Economics 101 style article to put the issue to rest.

A kinder interpretation would be that Coming has fallen for the trap of assuming that one’s economic circumstances are reflective of the general economy. There were some posts suggesting that because his deposits are greater than his debts, then the rise in rates gives him more money to spend.

I would have been guilty of that some time back when interest rates were approaching zero. While there was more incentive to spend or invest for better returns, there will be some who actually save more and cut back on spending – eg. Those on fixed incomes, self-funded retirees who need to stretch their dollar (like my parents), or renters saving for a house deposit (which was me once upon a time).

Of course, with debt binging never going out of fashion in EZFKA, the frugal are in the minority so the impact on national figures and thus policy makers is neglible. During the low rate environment, most home owners would have been busy refinancing, tapping into equity or taking on more cheap debt – hence the inflationary aspects of rate cuts as intended. There might have been some who were paying down their mortgage more quickly, but again, one can assume they were in the minority as most assumed that the good times would never end.

Peachy

Top comment. All makes sense.

the bits about coming and also the bits about incorrectly assuming everyone’s circumstances are like one’s own and the thumbnail sketch of peoples behaviours under low rate environment.

👏🏾 👏🏾 👏🏾 👏🏾

emusplatt

ya got me …lower IR = lower spend for me

The90kwbeast

You fucking idiot. Inflation is literally too much money chasing too few goods.

Coming

why don’t you read what I wrote you fucking IMBECILE, instead of creating your own straw men

Raising rates literally INCREASES the amount (and velocity) of money
while at the same time REDUCING the amount of goods produced

Last edited 1 year ago by Coming
No1

If it increases the velocity of money it would be the velocity of money paid towards debts and then sent to a tiny minority of rich people to be used on things that aren’t measured by CPI. So if your goal is to lower CPI, who cares.

No1

Also velocity of money has dropped in every recession, so you can guess where it is going to go soon.

Coming

right, so it has nothing to do with interest rates?

Increasing interest rates increases velocity

Yet recessions are associated with reduced velocity

You can see why the orthodox explanation makes no sense whatsoever

The90kwbeast

Because every recession is preceded by significantly higher interest rates

The90kwbeast

Your first point is laughably stupid. Please stop making a fool of yourself.

Your second point is possible however it also depends on a myriad of other factors of which interest rates are but one.

Stewie

I do remember reading arguments that raising interest rates can be inflationary. Undoubtably the mainstream view is that raising interest rates is deflationary. But in the interests of putting forward a heterodox view, I’ll chip in.

When you look at interest rates and inflation, the two track each other fairly well – but as inflation is difficult to measure by the second and minute, compared to interest rates, it is difficult to say unquestionably, which leads what.

The question may depend a lot on the composition of your economy – where does the disinflationary debt burden lie?

If 75% of the population don’t have a mortage and 25% of the population are mortgaged up to your eyeballs, where is the pain and benefit of an interest rate going to fall? Those holding large deposits are going to benefit.

But ahh yes…. raising rates has a negative impact on asset prices. Not so fast. What if interest rates are still below inflation? How will that impact peoples perspectives and behaviour?

If Cash is still not keeping up with inflation, then they are going to continue to spend, and spend more as they are receveing more. They will also have an incentive to borrow, especially if borrowing costs are still below the cost of inflation to acquire more assets.

In the 1970’s the bulk of the population were Baby Boomers – they were debt heavy and asset poor. Interest rates were eventually raised to sufficient heights in real terms to utterly crush the economy.

Today a large chunk of the population are debt and mortgage free. For a while it is possible that raising rates may actually be inflationary for some of the reasons Coming has listed, Rich Fucks and pensioners with large pools of cash suddenly having more money. Perhaps even psychologically a return to ‘normal rates’ may even boost reassurance in the economy.

Sometime it is useful to make a mind model and push it to the extreme in order to see how it impacts your argument.

Lets have an economy with zero debt and interest rates increase. Will this be inflationary or deflationary? I would argue inflationary, as there would be more money via interest chasing the same amount of goods.

Lets have an economy with 100% debt and interest rates increase. Will the be inflationary or deflationary? Deflationary, as there be less money via interest, chasing the same amount of goods.

IMHO the changing composition in terms of debt burden, may mean rising interest rates are inflationary in some parts of the economy and deflationary in others.

I think conventional economic theory will eventually prevail, but not before it may first be necessary to raise rates a lot higher and hold them there for a lot longer, inflicting crushing financial pain on 25% of the population. Only when that pain eventually leaches far enough out into the other 75% who are enjoying going out to eat and spend their disposable income in cafes, and interest rates switch over to being really positive, then will we start to see deflation.

**This will be my only contribution to this topic, as I’m not strongly bound to the above views and they were written as I tried to wrack my brain for possible reasons it could be inflationary – purely as an exercise in heterodox thinking. Mainly human behaviour and differences in debt distribution was all I could come up with.

Last edited 1 year ago by Stewie
Peachy

s I tried to wrack my brain for possible reasons it could be inflationary – purely as an exercise in heterodox thinking. Mainly human behaviour and differences in debt distribution was all I could come up with

yes, it’s important to acknowledge the distributional effects of changes in interest rates. I think the folks at EZFKA.Com do this well, the pinko lefties that they are.

Declining interest rates had very familiar and understood distributional effects. Because

  • not “all else is constant” and
  • power relationships

rising rates won’t be a perfect mirror image of this, but large aspects will be subject to reversal.

Stewie

yes, it’s important to acknowledge the distributional effects of changes in interest rates. 

Exactly

As I mentioned above (in an edit that missed your reply):

Sometime it is useful to make a mind model and push it to the extreme in order to see how it impacts your argument.

Lets have an economy with zero debt and interest rates increase. Will this be inflationary or deflationary? I would argue inflationary, as there would be more money via interest chasing the same amount of goods.

Lets have an economy with 100% debt and interest rates increase. Will the be inflationary or deflationary? Deflationary, as there be less money via interest, chasing the same amount of goods.

IMHO the changing composition in terms of debt burden, may mean rising interest rates are inflationary in some parts of the economy and deflationary in others.

Last edited 1 year ago by Stewie
Stewie

lol

“in the interests of putting forward a heterodox view, I’ll chip in.”

I literally had to wrack my brain in order to come up with that arguement. It was just an exercise in heterodox thinking. I’m not welded to it in the slightest, I just tried to fashion the idea that interest rates may be inflationary as a coherent arguement.

Sometimes it is interesting to come up with an opposite reason to do something.

I’ll leave it there, and only add that I think ultimately raising interest rates in our economy will be deflationary.

Last edited 1 year ago by Stewie
The90kwbeast

Thank you for your contribution.

Although I would suggest that as all cash created is debt, and I believe you are an accountant as am I, then those hypotheticals will be just that.

All debts or call cash won’t and will never exist.

It’s entirely down to the distribution of who has what and the concentration of debt and cash.

Aussie Soy Boy

It looks like a recession is coming in the US it won’t happen though until companies start laying off workers not just in bloated tech companies.

JimCentralBanking

“You still think inflation is caused by too much money?”

Basically, yes. Too much money creation relative to production.

“You still think higher interest rates will fix this?”

Yes. Raise rates until they’re positive real by a couple of % and watch it fall. If the central banks hadn’t raised rates inflation would higher than it is now.

Coming

k, but higher rates leads to more money

emusplatt

“Both Maiden and Wilkinson are named as respondents to the defamation action in the court documents.”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-09/bruce-lehrmann-defamation-cases-network-ten-news-life-media/101953740

Coming

https://www.instagram.com/p/CodO_xYSUK7/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

even crikey.com has turned on Britt now

the wheels are falling off the victim train

Peachy

But she’s got her cash now from the gov, yes?

emusplatt

now the game is, how much of it can she keep?

Peachy

All of it, if she’s smart and buys a house.

they’d not sell that from under her. Not in Ezfka.

No1

But you can’t eat your house as the pensioners remind us 🤔 she needs to get on the disability pension post haste

Coming

Maybe she can do it like Homer Simpson did

morbid obesity

emusplatt

still thinkin’ there’s a possibility of a lien held against that house…caymans ftw

Coming

Maybe Bruce will sue her too

maybe the government will too, for fraud

emusplatt

just not this gov’t. …sleazy fks were using this.

Aussie Soy Boy

She would be good in bed.

Coming

yeah well she started young

Brittany + Tame anagram = anti matter

emusplatt

some cvnts should stfu…. getting burnt now

https://twitter.com/rachellejmiller/status/1623622218306695170

emusplatt

this drags on for yonks… see how far I get over the weekend

https://lakaruppropet.se/international-conference-pandemic-strategies/

stagmal

there 100% is an abo crime wave atm. my guess is there’s a demographic bulge of male abo kids roughly moving into mid-late adolescence/early adulthood that is kicking off right at this time. it’s the same as how there was heaps of crime all over the world in the late 60s-70s-80s bc that was when the baby boomers started coming of age.

Peachy

Fuck me

7378F8CC-DD51-4CF6-88FC-F0582D09D215.jpeg
emusplatt

zero responsibility taken

Peachy

Like, she’s a mother, I get it. I get how she can personally think that.

but to say that to the reporter for publication across the EZ…. 🫢

emusplatt

yeah …and the injuries she’s bleating about were self inflicted …the useless thieving prick dropped the bike!

Last edited 1 year ago by emusplatt
Aussie Soy Boy

We should be allowed to kill thieves in order to retrieve our property. I don’t think vigilante hunts should be allowed, but certainly allowed to chase someone down until they give up what they stole.

Aussie Soy Boy

And a motorbike is worth far more than some juvenile abo thief.

stagmal

Lol reminds me of this call

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fInI2cKEMYA

Aussie Soy Boy

Just a boong. They are all the same.