Sooooooo… What was the go? I thought it might have been taken down because of the Brittany Higgins post…
What a joke. She gets utterly destroyed and exposed as a liar, suddenly unavailable. No doubt she’ll blame mental health.
Same. Some of the comments are obviously illegal. The people on here don’t believe in freedom of speech. They believe in hiding behind their internet proxies and offloading the legal risks to Peachy.
It would be nice if I could have my picture posting privileges back Edit: and like that I can post pics again!
Nice deflection. Try posting a pic showing that you are too chicken shit to publicly make comments that could influence court proceedings. Much easier for you to hide behind Peachy’s skirt.
What the fuck are you talking about cunt? I’ve never posted a single thing about court proceedings. To be honest I couldn’t give a fuck about Brittany or the guy that rooted her. Stupid cunts like you spend too much time paying attention to MSM and choking on everything Murdoch feeds you.
Hilarious. Please show me on that doll where I hurt you.
It would be nice if I could have my picture posting privileges backEdit: and like that I can post pics again!
It would be nice if I could have my picture posting privileges back
Edit: and like that I can post pics again!
that’s pretty lucky for you! I hope you use the power for good and not for evil.
did anyone else get picture posting powers back?
I had a recent experience of a site shutting and opening up again similar to here. Its called mrbakedbeans collectables and sells seeds to help baking. I think its either random or them planting spyware to collect data on us. I don’t really give a fuck that they know that I know how the world works and who owns my ass anyway. And that I hate the SMH and think that Fitzsimons is a total big fuckface
Looks to me like it sells stickers and collectable boxes
Yep, nothing to see, they pick on the innocent.
mine have been gone for a year now 🙁
stagmal, et al
I didn’t get my picture posting privilege back, but figured out a way to get around it.
First pic is when I am logged in – no pic posting privilege.
Second pic is when I am logged out – pic icon is there, you just type in your name/email and voila – you post pics under your regular login.
And second pic
What was controversial / illegal about that post ?
EZFKA Twitter account still going hard.
Nothing. Satire is protected speech even under 18C. Been tested in court a few times, wouldn’t be concerned.
The real question is why arent the Betoota/Chaser crowd touching this trial? Because they’re wimps.
Further, I dare say the only people who need to be concerned of being sued are Lisa Wilkinson and Peter Fitzsimons. Bruce is probably already preparing the civil suit.
I don’t think the main post was illegal. Some of the comments on the topic though.
Like what ?
are uninvolved parties not allowed to comment ?
did I say something lol
I don’t know if you said it. Not allowed to publicly state that someone is guilty, liar, or anything else that could influence the outcome of a court proceeding.
is this true ?
ive broken the law hundreds of times then
so has everyone else
just the Chris Dawson trial alone would have 70% of the population up on charges
They passed laws trying to hold social media page admins accountable for this party comments but like all good bureaucratic decisions, absolutely impossible to enforce.
99% of Twitter and Facebook would be charged right now for their opinions on this trial. Even Brittany seems to have given up because she realizes her case is bullshit.
To avoid confusion you should always make it clear that it is your OPINION she isn’t telling the truth.
Having objectionable opinions isn’t illegal, stating your opinions as though they are statements of fact leaves you open to be sued. You are of course free to point to facts in order to support your opinion, even if you draw the incorrect conclusion (assuming acting in good faith).
I’m with Freddy on most of his concerns though. It isn’t fair to Peachy and other people who make contributions to this site in terms of providing content or admin services, in that it potentially creates joint legal exposure.
Australia has some of the toughest defamation laws in the world. We all laughed at the speed with which DLS issued a groveling apology to Rudd when he crossed the line – but it was for good reason he did, as he was at risk of being in serious trouble.
I think people who contribute articles should really consider twice the content of what they post, and if it is possible for it to be misconstrued. There are some media personalities and organisations who employ people specifically for the purpose of stomping on anyone who attacks their character – that usually means aggressive litigation. These considerations should be double if there are legal cases going on
In terms of commenting, I’m not so sure about defamation as I’m not sure if you are actually publishing – they use to be called the Opinions sections. The fact that everyone also uses pseudonyms may reduce the risk that individuals can sue each other, or the administrators, simply because one said a nasty thing about the other.
But as to an anonymous commentator continuously defaming a prominent media character from the comments sections… it is imho a lack of social grace in that it may collectively increase the risk born by others e.g. Peachy – or what appeared to happen to this site over the weekend.
Can’t be defamatory if it’s fact
That is not proof that it’s a fact. Thats proof that someone else unrelated also claimed it’s a fact.
I never said it was controversial nor illegal. More thought some upset soyboy feminist type may have reported ezfka and had the site taken down for the Britt article.
Guess who’s back!
That chap S Morris Don’t buy Now tosspot. See what happens when this site goes down..
Lovely to be with you aĺl again , just the NSA way of saying g’day huh
Be straight with us
did the spooks get to you
or did you forget to pay the bill
partly curiosity partly need to prepare if it’s the former I would have thought we were too small to bother with
but please just put some ads on – I’ll be very interested to see what advertisers we attract
Agree on the advertising.
Glowies DGAF about some shit stirring economics blog. They barely have resources to police the dark web and monitor foreign chatter. They probably do read it though and have a laugh.
Well since EZFKA was down Kanye West is naming the Jew, Vlad has escalated things in Ukraine and Brittany Higgins has tapped out of her own trial.
Convonced Peachy has more influence than just at the RBA amd this was a stunt.
The big moustache wig seems to be having enough of sitting idle and receiving endless tickles, in my opinion
The Scottish Swan who was not adverse to the spotlight during covid also is what one calls a wearer of a little hat.
Been away the last couple of days, did I miss something? EZFKA taken down?
thought we were toast
Brit being a slob is not slander it is a matter of public of record!
She skols drinks in one shot at a work function, then eats a box of Cadbury Roses in one sitting.
Plus look at her she’s a big fat massive unit!
Not to mention Britt has been caught telling a lot of fibs under cross-examination. If she doesn’t want to be called a liar she should have got her stories straight before making allegations against young Brucey!
Taking personal leave to get out of going to court after being ripped to shreds is a classic female move. Next we’ll have the tears and and sobbing while on the stand. Always works!
higgins is a joke
she can attend a billion press conferences/protests/tv spots talking about her rape and theres no trauma in that apparently but having to do the same in a court and she cops out asap
no way this guys getting convicted now
game set match brucey
Yep. Soooo can’t wait for Bruce to go after the wilkfitzers. Is it illegal for him to do press , he she go for the throat of the lot of em. He needs to get his face out the there doing family stuff. Tell the press he doesn’t drink cause he has seen it ruin the careers of too many young folk ..
So is the trial going on today ?
ive read no further updates
higgins is in hiding YET AGAIN
how the fuck did a prosecutor agree to take this on? drop all charges imo
its amazing how this comment section is one of the few places that you ana ctually talk about her with other people online
all other news sites/youtube channels lock the comments or arent giving it coverage at all
only DM coming through with the goods
So shitposting is illegal now?
Horeshead Ardern must be really sensitive…
I’ve done some digging as to the potential cause of the “Account Suspended” notice, and there are a few. Violation of policy is one of them, but there are a few others. Given that all of the content is still there and accessible, at least from what I have seen, policy violation seems the least likely reason.
Regardless, I second some of the calls and comments made regarding the spirit of the conversation. Opinions and satire are fine as long as these are stated as such. I am not too certain about the illegality of some of the comments – I do not recall any posts inciting violence, for example. I do appreciate the robust discussion and shitposting, as long as these do not evolve into W@F-style personal attacks – I think all of the regulars here are older than 12.
Maybe we do need to have a robust discussion around self-respect, and respect to others? Some guidelines to follow in our contributions? Not talking censorship, more like personal responsibility, and not pointing fingers at anyone, except the one example mentioned above.
I was concerned over the weekend when the message about account suspension popped up. It was different from couple of other instances when the site was apparently hacked with loss of content. I value this forum and would like to keep it going.
And again I raise the question of contributions. I am not into virtual currency, but there has got to be a way to snail-mail an envelope stuffed with a couple of bills wrapped into a newspaper to a post office box, Shirley? I am also not well versed in online contribution options (Buy me a Coffee – I’ve seen it a few times), but anything internet-related automatically denies anonymity, or so the belief goes.
it is bc we made fun of wilkinson and her rock man husband thats why
Sorry, staggsie, I don’t buy this. The content would have been removed, no?
Unless Peachy comes out with some commentary “I can neither confirm nor deny” that is.
I was reading the site when it went down , I think it was a good pause to reflect as I went to comment and thought ooh I don’t know where this is going, bit too much, I’m not going to post that comment. And then blank screen.
ooh I don’t know where this is going, bit too much, I’m not going to post that comment. And then blank screen.
maybe the spooks were reading your comment as you typed it and they decided it was too much and pulled the plug?!
Maybe. Hard to tell. It was 7:30am I’d just finished the gardening and was sitting down having a couple of spliffs admiring my lush garden.
I mean, how funny would that be if it were true.
As I said above, theyre about to get sued into oblivion barring some monumental fuck up in court.
id be perfectly fine with a few porn/penis enlargement/crypto/filipina wife ads along the side
currently its just an empty cream-coloured space
You crazy guys. You assume that I know what’s going on here.
perhaps some slaps were administered in connection with the boisterous opinions that are sometimes posted or perhaps another bout of technical difficulties or perhaps those two are one and the same
I’d say it’s technical. This is a WordPress blog no? Par for the course in my experience.
From the WordPress Terms of Service:
You’re solely responsible and liable for all activity under your account. You’re also fully responsible for maintaining the security of your account (which includes keeping your password secure). We’re not liable for any acts or omissions by you, including any damages of any kind incurred as a result of your acts or omissions. If you get fired because of a blog post you write about your boss, that’s on you.
Pretty sure that’s wordpress.com nothing to do with self hosted wordpress
Lady and Gentlemen, Can some clever person tell me if Macquarie bank is well funded? Social media is hinting that some Aus neo-banks are going to go tits up. I have a lot of munny in a Macbank term deposit and was concerned. Thank you, Your best internet friend Argus Yong.
Isn’t MQG covered by the deposit guarantee?
Some of the neo banks failed due to raising deposits, but having nothing decent to invest them in. The EZFKA banks invest the deposits into mortgages. You can argue about house prices, but banking is all about gathering deposits and lending.
“Banks invest the deposits into mortgages”. Jesus fucking Christ, this is such a poor understanding of modern banking it’s not funny. Though could mean you could work at RBEZFKA cause they are fucking clueless about modern banking too.
“Banks invest the deposits into mortgages”. Jesus fucking Christ, this is such a poor understanding of modern banking it’s not funny.
well, it’s not exactly wrong. and exactly right when it comes to neobanks.
it’s just not the whole story.
Yes, I simplified it to show the issue confronting neo-banks. No use raising deposits if you can’t get a return greater than what you are paying depositors.
Hello RamJ, Yes, Macbank is covered by the govt $250k guarantee, but I have a lot more than that with them.
Yes, Macbank is covered by the govt $250k guarantee, but I have a lot more than that with them.
this is making a mistake. The pricing of deposits offered by macbank is set on the basis that it is riskfree (ie guaranteed).
if your deposit with them is so large that it doesn’t benefit from the guarantee – you’re taking a bad price.
List of authorised deposit-taking institutions here:
List of authorised deposit-taking institutions covered under the Financial Claims Scheme https://www.apra.gov.au/list-of-authorised-deposit-taking-institutions-covered-under-financial-claims-scheme
Should you need to make use of the Guarantee scheme, best to make sure that you won’t need the money in a hurry.
Thanks for the link. I didnt know that the $250k guarantee is for one institution and doesnt include subsidiaries. Fuck me, I’m going to buy an investment property instead, at least that’s Golden.
You can find quite a bit of useful info on ADI’s here:
Monthly Authorised Deposit-taking Institution Statistics https://www.apra.gov.au/monthly-authorised-deposit-taking-institution-statistics
Peach probably forgot to renew the domain
One in 20 years, big golf clap. They are as bad as the rba.
damn im good
And Aussie Soy Boy’s comments; ”I mentioned in the other article that anyone who watched Four Corners would realise Albo has no chance in the election $3.10 for the Liberals is the easiest money you’ll make all year.”
I find myself nodding in agreement with Derek
but you’ve now given me cause to bookmark one of your Ukraine predictions
looking even worse than UK gilts at the moment
feeling, nothing is rlly happening rn besides missile strikes which are mostly theatre
we wont see much tempo until nov/dec
You should do a post on General Armageddon. Soon to be assisted by General Winter.
thinking of doing a big recap with some falsifiable predictions soon
I did have to do some googling to refresh my memory on Monday, watching every news channel about russian “genocide”, attacks on civilians, unacceptable levels of deaths (11 reported on Monday from memory).
So, 11 civilians killed from 200 rockets. ~80, if you listen to UA’s sources, with 50% of those shot down. So, say, 40 rockets made it through, 11 dead, while bombing legitimate (or not) military targets. Pretty horrific, according to the news. 40 rockets – 11 dead.
Then I had to google this little tidbit to refresh my memory. One airstrike in Kabul targeting a militant (who turned out to be innocent) + 9 members of his family (including 7 children) – no outrage, nothing in the news. 1 rocket – 10 dead.
And let’s not even talk about Yemen. Or Iraqi children, because their deaths were worth it, if you ask Madeleine Albright.
also remember 1999. and Time cover claiming bombing civilian targets is nice and acceptable
Good to see Joe Rogan start to look into the Ukraine.
He’s a good conduit to by pass msm control of the narrative. The ZH article is pretty light on details, but even if he just starts scratching the surface, then its more investigative journalism than any girlboss war correspondent SBS trots out to for their analysis.
That bloke, Dave Smith, interviewed by Rogan, details more about the background to the Ukraine conflict in ten minutes than the West MSM has been able (willing) to do in eight months:
why do you say it wont move until nov/dec
that is bad news for markets
cuz the mobilised arent trained and ready yet
the full 300k won’t be in theatre until maybe new years
plus its autumn there now so everything is turning to mud making any offensive operations hard
mobilised suppose to be ex conscripts doing compulsory military training in youth so it should be a refresh course. Imo mud does nutting for Ruskies but so it does nuttin for Ukros too… we see. Father Frost does miracles for Euro Utopia (EU)
“mobilised suppose to be ex conscripts doing compulsory military training in youth so it should be a refresh course.”
I suppose it’s possible that since their “compulsory military training in youth” there just might have been some technical changes and advances in weapons systems, communications systems, IT systems, administrative systems and the like.
I’m guessing that you haven’t had a lot to do with the military, particularly in the technical training area?
indeed however it is not a major task to retrain someone over to pull junkies and crimos from streets and training them in anything. I reckon many are already in the theatre of absurd, the rest are in training g photo ops for the purpose of not advertising the begining of the next level of the Duke Nuke’m
Thanks, you’ve answered my question.
You know fuck-all about training in the military.
higgins copping out again?
when does this get declared mistrial
maybe the defence lawyer can apply for dismissal or something
she can probably still manipulate that into a girl power type grifting career like grace tame (poor Britt was attacked by the big bad male lawyer, believe all women, the court system is skewed in favour of men etc)
might be a better outcome for her than not guilty
hoping that defence calls her then-boyfriend and asks him when was the next time they fucked and did he notice any stray jizz
someone owes scomo an apology
guy was roasted over the coals for allegedly ‘letting this happen’ when more and more its sounding like it never even occured from the start
wonder if this whole thing was decisive in costing him the election
if so thats more of a scandal imo than the retarded minsterial self-appointment debacle that was going on a few weeks ago
ok she’ll be back, i suspect one of her handlers was taking her behind the scenes and grilling her f out for her fucking up on friday
now they’re saying it will be over by mid next week lol
the prosecutor has given up
ScoMo was roasted not because he “allowed this to happen”, but how we tried to deflect this and other instances. Some of the things he tried to deflect were pretty bad. I think his handling of the accusations caused his damage in the polls, not necessarily the accusations themselves.
She just cares about the book deal at this point. Maybe her lawyer stumbled on some inconsistency just told her to stay home and cry mental illness. Just tell everyone you felt suicidal they’ll leave you alone.
There’s certainly nothing wrong with her apart from pre-existing mental illness such as sociopathy, narcissism, alcoholism and nymphomania.
They’re the best ones, especially if they’re above the line on the Crazy – Hot scale.
Hey Peachy, I’m very glad the outage was only temporary. Associating with the other ermm….”unconventional thinkers”…here does me a power of good, and I greatly missed it during The Absence.
Woman with no history of vision problems has both eyeballs fall apart shortly after getting Covid Jab. No shit!
Safe and Effective!
retinal detachments occur all the time in myopic people
it got slammed later on
Ok, but simultaneously bilateral detachment with no trauma or other cause? Maybe it’s nothing, maybe it’s something.
It’s usually bilateral as the predisposing factors to detachment are obviously bilateral
How do you mean – most retina detachments occur in both eye’s simultaneously? Or is bilateral obfuscating medical speech for both sides of one eye?
My brother got a detached retina after he got an octopus strap hit him in the eye. I would have thought it a bit unusual for someone to be sitting in a chair and have both their retinas detach for no obvious reason.
Rhegmatogenous detachment is almost always eventually both eyes as it’s a generalised degenerative condition
Your use of obfuscating medical speech caused me to go away and learn that there are three common causes for detatched retinas. Learning objective completed for the day.
teach a man to fish etc
so now you can see there is no pathological mechanism by which a vaccine could possibly cause immediate rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
whoever wrote and approved that article should be deregistered for being a moron
I love your self confidence
There was no (known) pathological mechanism for thalidomide to cause birth defects either, until there was.
Eventually? Now I think you have no clue and you’re blowing smoke out of your arse.
Been flat out like a lizard in the sun for the past couple days – first chance I’ve had to waste time by reading ZH for days.
Saw this Pearler of an article about the US politician that I hold at the pinnacle of all their politicians – not in an evil corrupt Nancy Pelosi sort of way, but in an honorable fashion that use to inspire political engagement…. Tulsi Gabbard:
Quite like the article too and the speculation the author engages in – was nodding along in agreement as I’ve long held Tulsi was cock-blocked by the Davos/DNC/media set when she ran against Hillary. I’ve always stated I’d like to see her run, and the De Santis machinations are interesting to hear.
She’d get my vote…..but what chance an honourable politician in the american system?