This will be a brief post based upon a little thought cloud I had earlier today. I don’t know whether Brittany is an actual victim of rape or not, I don’t know whether the accused (Bruce Lehrmann) actually raped her. My question is, why are they parading her around on T.V like she is already a victim. Whenever she is given a podium to speak about rape, they are already effectively concluding that she was raped and that her accused is guilty, even though there has been no trial yet. She has absolutely no claim to fame otherwise, the only reason she has been granted a platform is because of what allegedly happened to her. Because she has that platform, it is concluded that what allegedly happened really did happen to her.
How is this not prejudicial? How can a trial proceed given these circumstances?
Why the eff this girl on T.V?