The Toxic Feminine

Corbie Walpole – a name you have undoubtably NOT heard in the msm.

She is the strong independent woman who poured petrol over her male friend when he jokingly said she should ‘get back to the kitchen‘ leaving him with burns to 63% of his body, was put in a coma for 10 days, spent another 74 days in a burns unit, required 10 surgeries, can no longer go in the sun and has trouble regulating his body temperature as his sweat glands were burned off.

Perhaps it is her predatory number of teeth, on par with your average Great White, but I have followed the story on the Noticer since I first came across it. I suppose mainly because it was so odd (I will admit chicks charged with this sort of violence is pretty rare) but the fact it is so odd that the msm has completely ignored it, other than one or two perfunctionary reports, has made it even odder.

Anyhow, Blair Cottrell (yes – that guy) has written an interesting opinion piece on it drawing connections between how Corbie thinks and justifies herself, and the same problematic female thinking that is repeated writ large throughout society – basically everywhere they have been empowered.

It is filled with these sort of pearlers:

The woman is virtually incapable of considering anything you’ve said without thinking about how it pertains to her personally. She even suspects you may be subtly referring to a certain shortcoming regarding her own character, by discussing human nature generally.

…it has certainly been my experience around the traps.

While the woman in this particular case obviously has some other mental issues going on and was apparently a coke-head on top of that, which might account for a large part of the act of violence, the thing that I found most interesting about her was how she has portrayed herself as the victim in much of her defense, and her complete inability to accept the consequences of her actions.

And indeed, Corbie had her reasons for setting her victim on fire. She was “feeling overwhelmed”, in her own words, by “misogynistic comments” she claims her victim made, while they drank together at a party.

Not only has Miss Walpole essentially blamed her victim for what she did, she also believes she should walk free. Corbie instructed her lawyer to argue for a non-custodial sentence on the grounds that prison would be detrimental to her mental health

Blair then goes on to make some very interesting and insightful wider observations about how toxic feminine thinking can be to our institutions and general social narrative.

I have written before in ‘Life in the Longhouse’ about the toxic effect of female influence in the workforce and how women through HR drive out all men who display typical masculine traits of disagreeableness (which women often misinterpret as aggression, because using Blair’s observation they are unable to process any criticism, event or issue, without passing it through the lens of how it relates to them).

Women are overrepresented in professions, such as human resource management (73 percent) and compliance officers (57 percent). These are the places that determine workplace behavioral norms, they have an outsized influence on professional culture, which itself has an outsized influence on American culture more generally.

This is important because of the second order effects in that it also determines the type of man that women will chose to place in leadership positions. This has been an empowering factor behind the rise of the SoyBoy, and the weak effeminate leaders we are seeing so much more of.

It is also my contention that it is women’s neuroticism in our economic social narrative that has seen ‘Recessions’ pathologized to the point where its apparently a better choice to flood your country with socially destructive third worlders & inflate house prices to the point the next generation can’t afford them, than it is to see GDP decline for 2 consecutive quarters.

To return full circle and quote Blair once again:

Basically, its almost impossible to talk about anything broadly with a woman because she’s always thinking inwardly and of individuals: normally of herself and whoever is in her immediate vicinity. She may also think about the status and security of her immediate family, but nothing else beyond that can be effectively processed or understood, except insofar as how it affects her personally.

Recessions are a necessary and useful part of the economic cycle. But imho they have been pathologized by both the female voter and women in our social economic narrative, who have neurotically boosted the fear surrounding recessions, by only being capable of considering how a recession could affect them personally and not the wider benefits that a clean sweep would bring to the economy.