Hate speech and civil society

Drew Pavlou posted this and it’s been picked up by onenation:

It purports to show an Israeli being told by a muslim nurse in Australia that she is killing jews in Australian hospitals.

Given the passing of the hate speech laws, this may have been staged to justify them.

It is normal not to trust outsiders. It is normal to prefer one’s own race, that is people who look like our parents. That doesn’t mean outsiders can’t be trusted. It doesn’t mean insiders can be trusted. But it probably does mean there’s a skew in favour of your people treating you a little bit better. I question my suspicion and other views.

Serpentza, a south african white who used to live in China, on youtube reported how chinese would curse him as he walked by. He knew chinese. I have experienced similar things in various places. Everybody everywhere is racist. We are without doubt importing those that hate us on the basis of race. There is embedded and growing racism towards whites from aboriginals.

This hatred first became undeniable at 9/11 and later attacks in London, France, Germany and also in Bali. But immigration has been ramped up instead of diminished. Instead of building social cohesion, it is being undermined. Islam is not the problem per se. It’s 3rd world outsiders who do not have the skills, experience, attitudes and resources needed to prosper honestly. They are a serious threat to our civil society. When the handouts stop, as they inevitably will when the last bit of the productive economy becomes unprofitable, there will be a surge in violent crime. It’s already happening in Melbourne, plenty of suggestion that it’s happening in the UK.

I have said before that we may already be beyond the point we can save ourselves. To put up with this the way we have for so long begs the question. However, I am not convinced that Thomas Sewell’s approach is the way forward. I have a politically active leftist friend with a Philippino wife and mixed race offspring who has had the lives of his family threatened by people aligned with a national socialist group in Australia, all because of their race. More than 99% of Australians do not want that. Those guys are convinced that is what they have to do to win.

One the train this week I have seen adverts for a number of new housing estates. All of them depict Indian families. It is now absolutely undeniable that the purpose of mass migration is to line the pockets of property investors.

Watching the suburbs be populated with foreigners, experiencing growing racism towards me and my people, watching the government trample on our political rights, and being told it’s for the public good, is losing. Winning means a society at peace with itself, widespread prosperity, a shared vision for the future, a shared understanding of the past, a great deal of personal freedom, and limited migration.

I suggest that given the demolition of our culture and people we now require the kinds of written legal protections found in the USA. The Westminster system relies on a culture that no longer exists.

One way to do that is to gather in one state and then secede. Sewell picked SA, but SA is mostly arid. I’d go for QLD. TAS might be the easiest since it has the highest fraction of Australian born, but its economy is depends on handouts from the mainland. You’d have to make it an export powerhouse first. QLD has a much greater sense of itself than most other states in my experience. By working cooperatively to amplify that, perhaps you could build a populace ready to leave. It might be quicker to become part of the USA.

If you can get there, if you have the right skills, the right bank balance, and the right birth year, you should go.