If anyone has paid attention in recent years, the war for complete personal freedom comes through the constant violation and erosion of the customs and beliefs of our Egregore… ie Christian notions around sexuality, sin, gender the role of the family, etc.
There has been a gradual ongoing war fought in the shadows, sadly with many victories by the kiddy fiddlers under the claims of ‘rights and personal freedoms’:
California Legislature Passes Bill Reducing Penalties for Oral, Anal Sex with Willing Children
The gradual normalisation of ideas that children should “explore their gender identity” even as young as toddlers, or that they were “sexual entities” is something would have been considered nearly inconceivable just 20yrs ago. Yet here we are where such ideas and topics are now part of the national discussion. Under the dominant Christian cultural view, before we were colonized by the Cultists, was that a children’s sexual identity be left for them to find out for themselves, adults have no part involving themselves in that process of self discovery.
Yet all these ideas all come from somewhere – gender as a spectrum is a cultural idea for some cultures, eg, some tiny Islands in the Pacific, a couple in Africa, and of course Judaism. In a MultiCult society it increasingly seems these two incompatible ideas are forced to share the same space. I would argue that the result in terms of social acceptance and tolerance of these new values, shows whose culture really has the upper hand in this culture war.
Anyhow, it was with interest that I read the following ZH article, and the rabbit hole it took me:
The 68-page report titled Standards For Sexuality Education in Europe, also calls for supplying information to toddlers about “enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body, early childhood masturbation.”
The policy paper also states that kids between four and six years should “talk about sexual matters” and “consolidate their gender identity.”
Which then further down the article lead me to this:
The development comes on the heels of two UN bodies publishing a report that outlines an agenda to decriminalise all ‘consensual’ sexual activity, even between adults and minors.
Which upon further investigation lead to this site:
That was filled with provocative claims designed to white ant social revulsion towards minor age sex.:
“Sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law.”
The argument being that because of this it is more appropriate to view the relationships within a spectrum, defining an adolescent as 10-19 yrs, and that adult minor relationships should be viewed in that context even up to the age of 24. Personally I think a 10 yr old is a kid and not an adolescent, and that a 24 year fucking around with a 15 or 16 yro is asking to be buried under a termite mound.
But then they did it, they included this quote
In an accompanying press release, Ian Seiderman [Every.Single.Time] Law and Policy Director at ICJ noted that “Criminal law is among the harshest of tools at the disposal of the State to exert control over individuals … as such, it ought to be a measure of last resort however, globally, there has been a growing trend towards overcriminalization,” adding “We must acknowledge that these laws not only violate human rights, but the fundamental principles of criminal law themselves.”
And loh! From there I found my way back to the UN:
Basically every outlandish comment in the original ZH that I could be bothered trying to verify if it was actually correct, lead back to these quasi UN websites.
Criminal law allows judges to already take these things into context, what these laws do is hobble their power to punish those that are truly guilty, or to provide a convenient legal backdoor for those who can afford a slick lawyer.