‘This is crazy’: World laughs at Australian parliament

The yet another new Aussie law (which is guaranteed to create indecent pleasure in convict culture) which got the sane world concerned have been swiftly passed by the senate overnight.

Because no one will be able to access any “social” media without proving they’re not younger than 16, this is effectively shoehorning the Digital ID legislation. It notches up the slow frog boiling, creating one more of plethora of seemingly “innocent” laws. When dozens of such laws are bundled together several years from now under guise of making laws more transparent and comprehensible, the hydra will grow another head – Youse types will embrace digital ID – ultimate farm tool to control the sheeple.

Well done EZ-Fkers, you got what you voted for in the last election (and all elections before). Keep voting some more for the same mob and expect a different outcome.

Double jabbed and particularly boosted types (you bragged yourselves) are encouraged to self-educate on the new law implementation here.

1 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stewie

That traitorous fucks in Parliament are ramming this through has never been in question. The deeper question which a shallow mind like your own never gets around to asking, is why and for who and why the urgency?

Basically its the Joos policy that is being implemented through their catspaws in Parliament. Jews have been lobbing both the Coalition and Labor nonstop to get this through.

This under 16s policy gumfph was entirely thought up as blow back started to build following last Oct when Zionists started genociding Palastinians. That Zionist prick Mark Leibler started getting owned on Twitter 6mths ago, which was right about when the sudden urgency to protect kids started to be being memed into existence.

We simply can’t have unidentifiable people saying nasty things about Jews and especially our greatest ally Israel, on the Internet, no matter how true, and have them get away with it.

They simply want to identify and prosecute anyone who posts antisemetic information or any narrative that deviates from their Holy Holocaust truth – you know the truth that you can never question.

Last edited 13 days ago by Stewie
Stewie

.

Capture-Copy-31
Stewie

Or more precisely

Freedom of information (FOI) documents confirm that the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) contacted the Leiblers through their law firm, Arnold Bloch Leibler, on 29 May, inviting them to come to a dinner at the Lodge the following week on June 4.

https://michaelwest.com.au/albanese-dining-with-billionaires-and-zionists/

This is basically policy designed to enable Zionists to identify, then deplatform people with opinions that they find harmful.

Capture-Copy-32
Agent 47

Yes I’ve long suspected that Leibler was up to his old tricks, this data adds weight to it. I remember he deleted his account for a while too because he couldn’t handle the pushback. There’s been a lot of kvetching on X and a lot of people are now starting to realize who really runs the country.

Which by the way is getting worse on Victoria which they seem hell bent on turning into a second Israel.

https://www.noticer.news/victoria-jewish-leaders-want-hate-speech-laws-sooner/

Stewie

Mouth breathing first order thinkers get all excited about one piece of legislation, without seeing how it ties into other existing legislation and the pattern of who has lobbied for it.

Starting with 18C and the lobbying by Liebler to have it passed (in order to introduce “Hate” as a crime).

Then, thanks to our Zionist AG Mark Dreyfus, we have 474.17D which basically makes it an offense for any person to use a carriage service to comment on a social situation or event where a specific person in any way shape or form is identified.

For example say you are at a public protest in Sydney supporting Palestine and there are Zionist agents provocateurs and Mossad agents there engaging in violence and bashing up women and kids (not unlike what recently occurred in Holland). Say you as a concerned citizen take a photo or video of the incident and share it on social media. You will now go to prison for seven years for sharing that photo or video.

Basically it means that only “accredited journalists” can now comment in public, without the risk of someone going to jail. Essentially he who kvetches loudest, will have all his enemies jailed.

If you remember this legislation suddenly became necessary following the doxing of a Zionist hate chat site, celebrating the genocide of Palestinians being exterminated (the fact that a bunch of Zionists did the same to One Nation in order to destroy its donor network has been conveniently memory holed).

Finally, the problem with this legislation is that it is effectively powerless in identifying individuals who anonymously post such information via social media – hence the now back door means of getting everyone to verify their identification in order to obstinately protect 16 year olds.

Of course the fact that it is Jews and Zionists all the way down in terms of pushing and lobbying for this legislation is purely antisemetic conjecture, because noticing Jews involvement in anything nefarious is a thought crime in and of itself (now punishable by 7 years in jail).

Capture-Copy-35
Last edited 12 days ago by Stewie
robert2013

fuuuuuck.

robert2013

They have already seized the judiciary so there’s every chance this will be given the most draconian possible interpretation. This is actually terrifying.

JimsCentralBanking

I hadn’t seen or heard anything on 474.17D until your post.

The note section basically confirms this is to protect Zionists being outed for running covert campaigns.

Stewie

With regards to all Australia’s law making in the past 20 years that could in any way be considered oppressive, it is basically Zionists all the way down.

JimsCentralBanking

It’s impossible to deny now. I’d given them the benefit of the doubt my entire life, but it’s impossible to unsee the Zionist mask slip post Oct 7 attacks.

Stewie

Yup the mask is definitely slipping. IMHO we are only a few short months away from people starting to go be jailed for speaking ill of our overlords, or commenting negatively as to public policy in respect of any identifable group (can’t “hate” MultiCult now – it is the law) just like they are doing in the UK.

Last edited 12 days ago by Stewie
A fly in your ointment

I’d given them the benefit of the doubt my entire life, but it’s impossible to unsee the Zionist mask slip post Oct 7 attacks.

And yet you still defend joos making you take the joo jab which made a bunch a joos twice as rich.
I know… because when you see through that one, it makes you feel stupid for taking the joo jab so you rather close your eyes and pretend it’s safe and effective, eh?

JimsCentralBanking

I had my twitter account locked because I was critical of a few accounts that were minimising jab risk and sharing shitty science. This happened during the first covid waves and vax rollout when we had data from overseas showing there was clotting risk with certain jabs, and risk of myocarditis with others.

Not only did no one make me get jabbed; I got jabbed knowing, without any doubt, that the jabs were not 100% safe and effective.

Here’s a question: what is your estimate for the risk of jab related myocarditis/stroke/etc six months after being vaccinated?

A fly in your ointment

oh, my…

Here’s a question:

what is your estimate for the risk of jab related myocarditis/stroke/etc six months after being vaccinated?

Reading this question makes one’s IQ dip by 120 points!

here’s the answer:
probably smaller than at the time of jabbadabba, however, it is infinitely higher than not taking the jab.

closet joo lover, like the other chap

JimsCentralBanking

it is infinitely higher than not taking the jab.

Not even close to being correct, but does explain a lot.

OzCuck

I’d say they might be into it if they knew it might block things like 4chan and macrobusiness. I wonder if they’ll consider MB to be far right.

The definition of ‘social media’ is anything where two or more people can post.

Oh well it’s not like there was much hope anyway legacy citizens take pride in not giving a fuck who they vote for. They think it’s a funny shitpost or something and they expect suburban nerds to magically fix everything or something on their own. They really are retards.

OzCuck

Looks like it although UK police don’t seem to need it to go after thought criminals.

It may help with preventing people getting their bank accounts emptied by scanners.

It may also help the anti mass immigration cause. People might pay more attention to the likes of SAP. Unless of course they do label the likes of them and MB as far right which wouldn’t surprise me.

But as I said anything where two or more people can post is considered social media so even a little rinky dink site that only talks about cars will have to have digital id infrastructure.. I guess that’s where ekaren comes in and she picks and chooses.

Or it could alll be mostly a load of hot air like how they stopped torrenting but not really. Legacy citizens sure like to put their foot down and claim to be prudent and based whilst being jewish af.

stagmal

dont trust the motives of the govt but in theory getting kids off instagay etc isnt the worst thing in the world

it should apply to everyone though not just 16 year olds

A fly in your ointment

Psst….
It’s not about kids *at all*

stagmal

whats it about

The90kwbeast

I assume he will mean thin end of the wedge and it becomes certain social media platforms are then banned or content is restricted down the track

The90kwbeast

In isolation 16 and under banned from social media is totally fine, so long as this stops at that. The problem is how do you stop legislative creep over the next 10-15 years not moving beyond that.

The90kwbeast

Oh well. Back to 2000s era chat forums or blogs.

A fly in your ointment

I think you forgot that the definition of “social” media is as wonky as it can be.
Group SMS can be on

Gruppenführer Mark

A very nice AI-generated video. How many conspiracies can you find? I found 7.

A fly in your ointment

Excellent, good music tooo. Can see its fake: there can be no sex party with Hitlery Clinton in it.

Missing Lolita Island mob

OzCuck

You’re lucky you’ve never known such simpishness. Or I dunno do wogs still bang when she gets a moustache? That should be a lefty movie.

A fly in your ointment

You know why Portuguese wear moustaches?
So they can resemble their mothers.

Since Gillette invented safety razor, only some men wogs wear moustaches and no women.

OzCuck

I believe it all why would you want war when you can live like gods. It’s like another version of mutuality assured destruction.

robert2013

I hope the world’s social media companies tell Australia to GAGF. I’d love to see the shit heads in Canberra attempt to build a firewall that works. Where TF is the resistance?

A fly in your ointment

Where TF is the resistance?

It’s looking elsewhere.
Bring in a few joos and it’s Pavlovian response into distraction guaranteed.

36
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x